Different structural preference of Ag(i) and Au(i) in neutral and cationic luminescent heteropolynuclear platinum(ii) complexes: Z (U)-shaped Pt2M2 type vs. trinuclear PtM2 type†
Kazuki Nishihara,Misa Ueda,Ami Higashitani,Yoshihide Nakao,Yasuhiro Arikawa,Shinnosuke Horiuchi,Eri Sakuda,Keisuke Umakoshi
Dalton Transactions Pub Date : 02/22/2016 00:00:00 , DOI:10.1039/C6DT00320F
Abstract

The reactions of monocationic Pt(II) complexes bearing N^C chelate ligands and Me2pzH, [Pt(N^C)(Me2pzH)2]PF6 (N^C = 2-phenylpyridinate (ppy), 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridinate (dfppy), benzo[h]quinolinate (bzq); Me2pzH = 3,5-dimethylpyrazole), with Ag(I) ions gave Z (or U)-shaped neutral tetranuclear Pt2Ag2 complexes [Pt2Ag2(N^C)2(Me2pz)4], while those with Au(I) ions gave neutral trinuclear PtAu2 complexes [PtAu2(N^C)(Me2pz)3]. On the contrary, the reactions of the dicationic Pt(II) complex bearing a N^N chelate ligand and Me2pzH, [Pt(bpy)(Me2pzH)2](PF6)2 (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine), with Ag(I) and Au(I) ions both gave Z (or U)-shaped dicationic tetranuclear Pt2M2 complexes, [Pt2M2(bpy)2(Me2pz)4](PF6)2 (M = Ag, Au). The structures of heteropolynuclear Pt(II) complexes were dominated by the nature of incorporated group 11 metal ions and the charge of complexes.

Graphical abstract: Different structural preference of Ag(i) and Au(i) in neutral and cationic luminescent heteropolynuclear platinum(ii) complexes: Z (U)-shaped Pt2M2 type vs. trinuclear PtM2 type