960化工网
Reply to the ‘Comment on “Non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly” by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d
Claudia Caltagirone,Alessandra Garau,Francesco Isaia,Vito Lippolis,Riccardo Montis,Martina Olivari,Mariano Andrea Scorciapino
New Journal of Chemistry Pub Date : 02/26/2014 00:00:00 , DOI:10.1039/C4NJ00170B
Abstract

We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663–669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “Non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly” by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d
平台客服
平台客服
平台在线客服