Coke and Chemistry ( IF 0 ) Pub Date : 2023-06-01 , DOI:
10.3103/s1068364x23700461
V.M.Strakhov,I.M.Kashlev,M.A.Soloviev
The use of poorly caking SS coal as a reducing agent in electrofurnace production of ferrosilicon is considered. The characteristics of coke nits, SS coal, and wood chips are compared. SS coal offers some advantages over coke as a reducing agent: lower ash content (Ad = 4.6, as against 11.2%); lower sulfur content (Sd = 0.26, as against 0.43%); very high electrical resistivity (ρ > 3.3 × 106, as against 3.7 Ω cm); and elevated reactivity with CO2 at 1000°C (\({{K}_{{{\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}}}}}\) = 1.92, as against 0.49 cm3/g s). The ash from SS coal has a low content of the oxides Al2O3, TiO2,and P2O5, which are harmful for ferrosilicon: the total (per 100 kg of carbon) is 2.2 times less than for coke. The gas obtained by pyrolysis of SS coal (at 900°C) has a high content of reducing components: CO + H2 = 210.8 m3/t, as against 11.2 m3/t for coke. At 1500°C, the content of CO + H2 in the gas is 80.8%. In heating SS coal to the temperature at the top of the electrofurnace (700–1000°C), its physicochemical properties change. However, it retains its advantages over coke: the carbon content Cfix increases to 91–92%; the carbon in the organic mass Cdaf is 96–98%; the porosity is 38–49%; and the structural strength is 80%. Industrial experiments (for 96–229 days) on the use of SS coal in a mixture with coke and wood chips shows that this is an effective reducing agent in the production of FS75 ferrosilicon. It ensures stable furnace operation, with 1.9–3.2% increase in productivity and 2.8–5.2% decrease in power consumption. In terms of carbon content, 43–47% of the coke may be replaced by SS coal.