Background and ObjectivePharmacokinetic or pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models have been instrumental in facilitating the clinical use of propofol in target-controlled infusion systems in anaesthetic practice. There has been debate over which model should be recommended for practice. The covariates model is an updated pharmacokinetic model for propofol. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate this model in an adult population.MethodsTwenty-nine patients were included, with a range of ages to assess model performance in younger and older individuals. Subjects received propofol through a target-controlled infusion device programmed with the covariates model. Subjects were randomised to one of two increasing/decreasing regimes of propofol plasma target concentrations between 2 and 5 μg.mL−1. After the start of the infusion, arterial and venous blood samples were drawn at pre-specified timepoints between 1.5 and 20 min and between 1.5 and 45 min, respectively. Predictive performance was assessed using established methodology.ResultsThe model achieved a bias of 9 (− 45 to 82) and precision of 24 (9–82) for arterial samples and bias of − 8 (− 64 to 70) and precision of 23 (9–70) for venous samples. Predicted concentrations tended to be higher than the measured concentrations in female individuals but lower in male individuals. There was no clear systematic difference in the bias between younger and older patients.ConclusionsThe covariates propofol pharmacokinetic model achieved an acceptable level of predictive performance, as assessed by both arterial and venous sampling, for use in target-controlled infusion in clinical practice.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT01492712 (15 December, 2011)

On 4 September, 2020, the US National Institutes of Health launched a new clinical trial, “A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Controlled Platform Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic and Additional Strategies in Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19.” This open-label, placebo-controlled, multicenter, adaptive platform study was designed to evaluate therapeutic options for patients hospitalized with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19. A variety of drugs and drug classes were selected, including heparin, the monoclonal antibody crizanlizumab, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and purinergic signaling receptor Y12 inhibitors. These medications have been widely used in the treatment of other conditions, from sick cell disease to type 2 diabetes mellitus and some forms of cardiovascular disease, but their inclusion in a study of COVID-19 was somewhat unexpected. This article examines the rationale behind the use of these disparate agents in the treatment and prevention of adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and explores how these strategies may be utilized in the future to address the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic.

AimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the extended physicochemical and biological stability of Sandoz Rixathon®/Riximyo® (SDZ-RTX) after exposure to out-of-fridge (OOF) conditions.Materials and MethodsThe impact of the short-term temperature excursion on stability parameters of SDZ-RTX was simulated by subsequently exposing the three batches of SDZ-RTX (100 and 500 mg) to OOF conditions, (I) 25 ± 2 °C/60 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) and (II) 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% RH, for up to 21 days after more than the claimed 36-month shelf-life storage in long-term conditions (5 ± 3 °C). Analytical methods used included the cation exchange chromatography (CEX), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and non-reducing capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate (nrCE-SDS), as well as biological activity by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)-bioactivity as well as further methods, for example, related to identity and pharmacopoeia test methods.ResultsNo notable changes were observed across all batches with respect to identity (charge and primary structure), pharmaceutical tests (clarity, visible and subvisible particles analytics, container appearance, degree of coloration, pH, osmolality, extractable volume, and container closure integrity testing), protein content by UV and microbiological parameters (sterility and bacterial endotoxins) under both OOF conditions. Only minor changes were observed for parameters evaluated via SEC, CEX, and nrCE-SDS. For potency (CDC-bioactivity) only one of the batches showed a relevant change. Even for these stability-indicating test methods, all analyzed parameters complied with the shelf-life specifications.ConclusionSDZ-RTX is safe for use even under worst-case conditions, for example, after subjecting it for up to 21 days at OOF conditions (25 ± 2 °C/60 ± 5% RH or 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% RH) after the batches had reached an age that was already beyond the claimed shelf-life.

BackgroundBAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)-targeting biologic used to treat several different cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer. A comprehensive physicochemical and functional similarity assessment is a key component of demonstrating biosimilarity between a reference biologic and a proposed biosimilar. Here we report the physicochemical and functional similarity of BAT1706 and reference bevacizumab sourced from both the United States (US-bevacizumab) and the European Union (EU-bevacizumab).MethodA large range of product attributes, including primary and higher order structure, post-translational modifications, purity, stability, and potency, were characterized for BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab using sensitive state-of-the-art analytical techniques. Up to 18 lots of US- and 29 lots of EU-bevacizumab, and 10 unique drug substance lots of BAT1706, were assessed.ResultBAT1706 was shown to have an identical amino acid sequence and an indistinguishable higher-order structure compared with EU/US-bevacizumab. BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab also exhibited similar post-translational modifications, glycan profiles, and charge variants. Potency, assessed using a wide range of bioassays, was also shown to be comparable between BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab, with statistical equivalence demonstrated for VEGF-A binding and neutralizing activity.ConclusionOverall, this extensive comparability exercise demonstrated BAT1706 to match EU/US-bevacizumab in terms of all physicochemical and functional attributes assessed.

BackgroundUrine is conventionally used as a specimen to document diazepam-related crimes; however, few reports have described the pharmacokinetics of diazepam and its metabolites in urine.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of diazepam and its metabolites, including glucuronide compounds, in the urine of Chinese participants.MethodsA total of 28 volunteers were recruited and each participant ingested 5 mg of diazepam orally. Ten milliliters of urine were collected from each participant at post-consumption timepoints of prior (zero), 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h and 2, 3, 6, 12, and 15 days. All samples were extracted by solid-phase extraction and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Diazepam and its main metabolites, except for temazepam, were detected in the urine of volunteers. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using the pharmacokinetic software DAS according to the non-compartment model.ResultsUrinary diazepam peaked at 2.38 ng/mL (Cmax) and 1.93 h (Tmax). The urinary metabolite nordiazepam peaked at 1.17 ng/mL and 100.21 h; temazepam glucuronide (TG) peaked at 145.61 ng/mL and 41.14 h; and oxazepam glucuronide (OG) peaked at 101.57 ng/mL and 165.86 h. The elimination half-life (t½z) and clearance (CLz/F) for diazepam were 119.58 h and 65.77 L/h, respectively. The t½z of the metabolites nordiazepam, TG, and OG was 310.58 h, 200.17 h, and 536.44 h, respectively. Finally, this study found that both diazepam and its main metabolites in urine were detectable for at least 15 days, although there were individual differences.ConclusionThe results regarding diazepam pharmacokinetics in urine would be of great help in forensic science and drug screening.

On 2 June, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved ibrexafungerp (formerly MK-3118 and SCY-078) for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis, also known as vaginal yeast infection. Ibrexafungerp is the first drug approved in a novel antifungal class in more than two decades, and the Food and Drug Administration’s decision was based on positive results from two pivotal phase III studies in which oral ibrexafungerp proved both safe and effective in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. The decision was also based on substantial preclinical and clinical work in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ibrexafungerp. This paper reviews that research and looks ahead to explore how this novel antifungal agent may be used in the future to address the expanding problem of drug-resistant mycotic infections.

Background and ObjectiveHuman plasma is used for the generation of several life-saving drugs and contains valuable antibodies from the immunoglobulin classes IgG, IgM and IgA. Purified intravenous IgG solutions (IVIGs) form the majority of plasma-derived medicine to treat patients with various forms of immunodeficiencies. In conventional IVIG manufacturing processes, immunoglobulin classes IgM and IgA are often discarded as contaminants, but these antibody classes have been proven to be effective for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Considering the increase in demand for human plasma-derived products and the ethical value of the raw material, a more resource-saving usage of human plasma is needed. Intensive research over the last decades showed that adverse reactions to IVIGs depend on the presence of thrombogenic factors, partially unfolded proteins, non-specific activation of the complement system, and blood group specific antibodies. Therefore, new IVIG preparations with reduced risks of adverse reactions are desirable.MethodA new manufacturing process that yields two biologics was established and quality attributes of the new IVIG solution (Yimmugo®) obtained from this process are presented.ResultsHere, we provide a biochemical characterization of Yimmugo®, a new 10% IVIG preparation. It is derived from human blood plasma by a combined manufacturing process, where IgM and IgA are retained for the production of a new biologic (trimodulin, currently under investigation in phase III clinical trials). Several improvements have been implemented in the manufacturing of Yimmugo® to reduce the risk of adverse reactions. Gentle and efficient mixing by vibration (called “vibromixing”) during a process step where proteins are at risk to aggregate was implemented to potentially minimize protein damage. In addition, a dedicated process step for the removal of the complement system activator properdin was implemented, which resulted in very low anticomplementary activity levels. The absence of measurable thrombogenic activity in combination with a very high degree of functional monomeric antibodies predict excellent efficacy and tolerability.ConclusionYimmugo® constitutes a new high quality IVIG preparation derived from a novel manufacturing process that takes advantage of the full therapeutic immunoglobulin potential of human plasma.

Background and ObjectivePL8177 is a selective melanocortin 1 receptor agonist in development for the treatment of various immunologic and inflammatory conditions. Here we describe the pharmacokinetics of PL8177 after subcutaneous (sc) delivery in animals and humans.MethodsMice, rats, and dogs were administered sc PL8177 at single doses of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg (mice); 1.0, 5.0, and 25.0 mg/kg/day (rats); or 1.5, 8.0, and 40.0 mg/day (dogs). Blood was collected over 24 h (mice) or 28 days (rats and dogs). Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple sc doses were also examined in human volunteers. Two dose levels were tested in two dosing cohorts of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/day for 7 days. Blood samples were collected through Day 1 and on Days 2 to 6 at peak and trough times based on analysis of the first two single-dose cohorts.ResultsIn mice, 3 mg/kg PL8177 resulted in an area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC∞) of 1727 ng·h/mL, a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 2440 ng/mL, an elimination half-life (t½) of 0.5 h, and a time to maximum concentration (tmax) of 0.25 h. Results for the 1-mg/kg dose were generally proportional. In rats, mean tmax values were independent of dose and ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 h for single and multiple dosing. Cmax values ranged from 516 to 695 ng/mL (1-mg/kg dose) and from 666 to 1180 ng/mL (25-mg/kg dose). In dogs, mean tmax values ranged from 0.4 to 1.3 h for single and multiple dosing. Values for tmax decreased with increasing dose and mean plasma Cmax increased less than dose proportionally (96–129 ng·h/mL [1.5 mg], 275–615 ng·h/mL [8.0 mg], and 633–1280 ng·h/mL [40.0 mg]). In humans, PL8177 was observed in the plasma within 15 min after a single dose and persisted for up to 48 h at higher doses. The tmax was 30–45 min (single dose) and 15–45 min (multiple doses). In multiple-dose studies, maximum steady-state plasma concentration (Cmax,ss) and AUC∞ increased with dose. Geometric mean Cmax,ss values were 20.1 ng/mL (1.0 mg) and 57.2 ng/mL (3.0 mg). AUC∞ values were 54.3 ng·h/mL (1.0 mg) and 199 ng·h/mL (3.0 mg). Unchanged PL8177 excreted in the urine was ≤ 1%, and accumulation was minimal.ConclusionPL8177 administration resulted in a consistent pharmacokinetic profile. The measured exposure levels resulted in pharmacologically active PL8177 concentrations at the targeted MC1R. Rapid absorption was seen in healthy volunteers, and multiple-dose administration over 7 days resulted in pharmacokinetic characteristics similar to those observed after single-dose administration. Results support the continued development of PL8177 to treat immunologic and inflammatory conditions.

Background and ObjectiveCervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women, and is one of the most common malignant tumors of the reproductive system. However, more effective treatment for cervical cancer is needed. In this study, we aim to investigate whether N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) could inhibit the proliferation of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive cells, and reduce cervical carcinogenesis.MethodsThe cervical cancer cell lines SiHa, HeLa, HPV-negative cell line C33A, and the immortalized human cervical keratinocyte cells S12 were used. The protein expression was determined using Western blot assay. mRNA expression was determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Cell proliferation was determined by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin V-FITC apoptosis kits. The numbers of colonies were measured using colony-forming assay. Xenograft tumor necrosis and HPV16 E7 expression were determined using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry.ResultsOur results showed that NAC treatment at the concentration of 1.5 mM significantly promoted cell apoptosis and reduced cell growth by inhibiting HPV16 E7 expression. NAC inhibited HPV16-oncoprotein-induced hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α protein expression and Akt activation in vitro. Additionally, NAC suppressed tumor growth, as evidenced by the smaller tumor size in the xenograft mouse model and decreased HPV16 E7 expression in tumor tissues.ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that NAC exhibits the potential to promote HPV-positive cell apoptosis, and suppress the proliferation of HPV-positive cells by inhibiting cell inhibitor of apoptosis protein 2 and HIF-1α.

Background and ObjectiveAdult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is an idiopathic systemic inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology. Some patients exhibit resistance to conventional treatment during long-term therapy. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) may contribute to the improvement in AOSD symptoms via the JAK–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with refractory AOSD.MethodsPatients were enrolled if they fulfilled the Yamaguchi AOSD classification criteria in China between 2020 and 2022. All patients were recognized as having refractory AOSD and were treated with oral baricitinib at a dosage of 4 mg once daily. A systemic score and prednisone dosage were used to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib at months 1, 3, and 6 and at the last follow-up visit. The safety profiles were recorded and analysed at every assessment.ResultsSeven female patients with refractory AOSD received baricitinib. The median age was 31 (IQR 10) years. Treatment was terminated in one patient due to progressive macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Others continued baricitinib treatment until the last assessment. The systemic score decreased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.0216), 6 months (p = 0.0007), and the last follow-up visit (p = 0.0007) compared with baseline. One month after the initiation of baricitinib, the rates of improvement in fever, rash, sore throat, and myalgia symptoms were 71.4% (5/7), 40% (2/5), 80% (4/5), and 66.7% (2/3), respectively. Five patients remained symptom-free at the last follow-up visit. In most patients, their laboratory values had returned to normal by the last follow-up visit. A significant reduction in the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.0165) and ferritin (p = 0.0047) was observed at the last visit compared with baseline. The daily prednisolone dosage significantly decreased from 35.7 ± 15.1 mg/day at baseline to 8.8 ± 4.4 mg/day by month 6 (p = 0.0256), and it was 5.8 ± 4.7 mg/day at the last assessment (p = 0.0030). Leukopenia due to MAS was noted in one patient. Except for mild abnormalities in lipid parameters, no other severe adverse events occurred during follow-up.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that baricitinib therapy could provide rapid and durable clinical and laboratory improvement in patients with refractory AOSD. Treatment seemed to be well tolerated by these patients. The long-term efficacy and safety of baricitinib therapy for AOSD should be assessed further in prospective controlled clinical trials in the future.Trial RegistrationTrial registration number (TRN): ChiCTR2200061599. Date of registration: 29 June 2022 (retrospectively registered).

Background and ObjectivePalovarotene, a selective retinoic acid receptor γ agonist, is under investigation for the treatment of dry eye disease. This study aimed to determine the ocular and systemic safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of palovarotene ophthalmic solution (PVO-OS) in healthy adults.MethodsThis was a randomised, vehicle-controlled phase I study (NCT04762355; retrospectively registered). Participants received either PVO-OS (at 0.025, 0.05 or 0.10 mg/mL) or a vehicle (placebo-to-match PVO-OS) once-daily or twice-daily for seven consecutive days. Safety was assessed by ocular and systemic assessments. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected before and after dose administration.ResultsThirty-six participants were randomised to PVO-OS and 12 to the vehicle. Overall, 89 treatment-emergent ocular adverse events (TEOAEs) were reported by 22 participants (61.1%) receiving PVO-OS and ten TEOAEs were reported by five participants (41.7%) receiving the vehicle. Erythema, irritation and skin dryness of the eyelid were the most common TEOAEs in participants receiving PVO-OS. The incidence of TEOAEs and eyelid-related findings in the PVO-OS groups increased with ascending dose and frequency compared with participants treated with the vehicle. All TEOAEs were mild (96.6%) or moderate (3.4%) and resolved without sequelae. Plasma palovarotene concentrations were generally measurable for up to 3–4 h for 0.025 mg/mL and 0.05 mg/mL and up to 12 h for 0.10 mg/mL dose regimens, independent of the frequency of administration.ConclusionsPVO-OS was generally well tolerated at doses up to and including 0.10 mg/mL twice daily. Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed for the once-daily and twice-daily regimens following multiple ascending doses of PVO-OS.

Background and ObjectivesIrinotecan sometimes causes lethal septic shock but the risk factors remain unclear. This retrospective case-control study explored the potential risk factors for septic shock following irinotecan treatment.Methods All women who received irinotecan-containing chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies at Shizuoka General Hospital from October 2014 to September 2020 were investigated. The clinical backgrounds and blood test results of those who developed septic shock after irinotecan-containing chemotherapy were compared with those who did not. Odds ratios (ORs) for developing septic shock after receiving irinotecan were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using univariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsDuring the study period, 147 women received irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. Three women developed septic shock due to neutropenic enterocolitis after irinotecan treatment, and 144 did not. The three patients with septic shock had recurrent cervical cancer, heterozygous variants in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene (two patients had *1/*6, one had *1/*28 variants), a history of concurrent chemoradiation therapy, 50–60 Gy of pelvic irradiation, and platinum-combined chemotherapy. A history of pelvic irradiation was identified as a possible risk factor for developing septic shock after irinotecan-containing chemotherapy (OR 63.0, 95% CI 5.71–8635; p < 0.001). The OR of UGT1A1 polymorphism for septic shock was 9.09 (95% CI 0.86–1233; p = 0.070) in the complete case analysis.ConclusionMedical personnel involved in cancer therapy should consider the possible risk of septic shock developing due to neutropenic enterocolitis when administering irinotecan-containing chemotherapy in patients with a history of pelvic irradiation.

Background and IntroductionSHR6390 is a new developed highly effective and selective small-molecule oral CDK4/6 inhibitor. We aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of SHR6390 tablets.MethodsIn an open-label two-way crossover study, 24 healthy Chinese volunteers were randomly divided into Group A and Group B, and 12 volunteers in each group received a single oral dose of a SHR6390 150-mg tablet under fasting and high-fat conditions. Blood samples were collected and determined for pharmacokinetic analyses. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for determining the SHR6390 concentration.ResultsThe time to maximum plasma concentration was not significantly affected by a high-fat diet. Compared with the fasting group, maximum plasma concentration, i.e., the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC0–t and AUC0–∞) was altered significantly, as evidenced by an increase of 56.9%, 38.6%, and 37.5% respectively. We identified seven metabolites of SHR6390 from the plasma samples, and we found no sex differences in metabolic pathways. All treatment-emergent adverse events were Grade 1 or 2.ConclusionsFood intake increased the maximum plasma concentration, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ significantly compared with the fasting condition. Meanwhile, single-dose SHR6390 for two treatment cycles is safe. SHR6390 was administered in a fasting status in the pivotal phase III study (NCT03927456) and chosen for the final drug label.

BackgroundMelatonin is an endogenous substance which plays a key role in sleep induction by reducing sleep onset latency; it has been approved by the European Food Safety Authority as a food supplement for exogenous administration. Oniria® is a food supplement formulated as 1.98 mg of prolonged-release melatonin tablets; it displays a dual dissolution profile in vitro.ObjectivesThe main objective of the present study was to evaluate the relative oral bioavailability of Oniria®, in comparison with immediate-release tablets (IRT) with a similar melatonin content as a reference. We also attempted to characterize the circadian rhythm of endogenous melatonin.MethodsWe performed an open-label, cross-over, randomized, phase I clinical study with two sequences and three periods involving 14 healthy volunteers. We characterized the endogenous melatonin circadian profile (period 1) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of both Oniria® and the reference melatonin (periods 2 and 3).ResultsTwo phases were clearly differentiated in the PK profile of Oniria®. An initial one, from dosing up to 2 h, and a delayed one from 2 to 11 h post-administration. During the initial phase, both melatonin formulations were equivalent, with a Cmax value close to 4000 pg/mL. However, in the delayed phase, Oniria® showed significantly higher melatonin concentrations than the IRT (three times higher at 4–6 h post-administration). Moreover, Oniria® exhibited concentrations above the endogenous melatonin peak of 80 pg/mL for up to 2.5 h versus the reference formulation, potentially suggesting an effect of Oniria®, not only in the induction of sleep, but also in the maintenance.ConclusionOniria® could be a highly promising food supplement, not only for sleep induction but also for the maintenance of sleep.

Background and objectiveSwallowing difficulties (i.e., dysphagia) occur in up to 40% of the adult general population, particularly among the elderly prescribed solid oral dosage forms. Pimavanserin is approved for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions in patients with Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) as a 34-mg capsule formulation. Patients with PDP may be at-risk for dysphagia that could affect administration of intact pimavanserin capsules. The stability of oral pimavanserin was evaluated in different liquid/soft food vehicles.MethodsThe stability of pimavanserin intended for oral administration was assessed by sprinkling the contents of 1 pimavanserin 34-mg capsule into water (40 mL), applesauce (40 g), vanilla Ensure (60 mL), or non-pulp orange juice (60 mL).ResultsThe stability study demonstrated >95% recovery within 24 hours after contents of a 34-mg pimavanserin capsule were dispersed in applesauce, vanilla Ensure®, orange juice, or water. Assay values at 24 h for individual capsules were within 5% of time zero, and no significant change in the impurity profile was observed in any vehicle. Pimavanserin degradation products recovered from various food vehicles for individual and total degradation products were < 0.5% at all time points. In addition, the impurity profile of compatibility samples matched that obtained for a control sample. ConclusionThese results support the ability of pimavanserin to be given orally by emptying the capsule contents into soft foods or liquids in accordance with the product label.

ObjectiveOur objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of test and reference (JANUMET®) formulations of sitagliptin phosphate/metformin hydrochloride tablets at a single dose of 50 mg/850 mg.MethodsThe study was a randomized, open-label, two-period, double-crossover trial. Volunteers under fasting (n = 24) and fed (n = 24) conditions were given a single oral dose of test or reference formulations of sitagliptin phosphate/metformin hydrochloride tablets 50 mg/850 mg. We used the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to determine the concentrations of sitagliptin and metformin in the plasma of subjects. Pharmacokinetic metrics were calculated using the WinNonlin 7.0 program, and bioequivalence was evaluated using SAS 9.4.ResultsUnder the fasting condition, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of geometric mean ratio for maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time t (AUC0–t), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) of sitagliptin between the test and reference groups were 101.70–120.62%, 99.81–105.61%, and 100.27–106.12%, respectively; for metformin, they were 90.39–111.48%, 94.76–109.12%, and 95.76–110.38%, respectively. Under the fed condition, they were 102.12–117.31%, 100.80–107.81%, and 100.82–107.78%, respectively, for sitagliptin and 95.53–105.22%, 92.76–103.07%, and 93.40–104.14%, respectively, for metformin. Both were generally well-tolerated.ConclusionThe two formulations of sitagliptin phosphate/metformin hydrochloride tablets were bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects.

BackgroundDopamine antagonists are the main pharmacological options to treat gastroparesis. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to evaluate the profile of adverse events (AEs) of dopamine antagonists used in the treatment of children and adults with gastroparesis.MethodsWe searched EMBASE and MEDLINE up to March 25, 2021, for relevant clinical trials and observational studies. We conducted a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the pooled occurrence of AEs (%), with 95% confidence interval (CI), from arm-level data across studies and the comparative occurrence of AEs from placebo-controlled clinical trials (odds ratio [OR] with 95% CI).ResultsWe identified 28 studies assessing AEs experienced by patients treated for gastroparesis with domperidone and metoclopramide; 22 studies contributed data to the meta-analyses. Cardiovascular, neurological, and endocrine AEs were commonly observed, with point incidences varying from 1 to > 50%. Clinically important AEs, such as QTc prolongation, occurred in 5% of patients treated with domperidone (95% CI: 3.32–8.62). Restlessness, an extrapyramidal AE, occurred in 15% of patients (95% CI: 7.48–26.61) treated with metoclopramide, with a 7-fold increase compared with patients receiving placebo (OR: 7.72; 95% CI: 1.27–47.05). Variation in terminology to describe extrapyramidal events precluded further pooled analyses. Additional meta-analyses were not feasible due to discrepancies in the assessment and reporting of the AEs.ConclusionsThe evidence confirms concerns of cardiovascular, extrapyramidal, and endocrine AEs in patients with gastroparesis treated with domperidone and metoclopramide. Imprecise AE reporting limits firm interpretation and conclusions.RegistrationPROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42021248888).

Lysins are bacteriophage-derived enzymes that degrade essential components of bacteria. Exebacase (Lysin CF-301) is an attractive antimicrobial agent because it demonstrates rapid bacteriolytic activity against staphylococcal species, including Staphylococcus aureus, has a low resistance profile, eradicates biofilms, and acts synergistically with other antibiotics. Combinations including exebacase and standard of care antibiotics represent an alternative to antibiotic monotherapies currently used to treat invasive staphylococcal infections. This manuscript reviews what is known about exebacase and explores how this novel agent may be used in the future to treat human bacterial pathogens.

Background and ObjectiveThis study was designed to explore the protective effects of a clinically available NLR family Pyrin domain-containing receptor 3 (NLRP3) inhibitor, tranilast, in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) mice.MethodsWe used pregnant C57BL/KsJdb/+ (db/+) female mice as GDM mice, then orally administered 20 mg/kg of tranilast or metformin daily for 2 weeks. A glucose tolerance test and an insulin resistance test were used to evaluate the severity of diabetes in tranilast/metformin-treated GDM mice. After delivery, newborn mice were counted and weighed to measure their protective role on the reproductive outcome of GDM mice. Next, we determined the expression of NLRP3 and proinflammatory cytokines in the visceral adipose tissue and placenta of GDM mice using western blot and quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, we determined the proinflammatory cytokines in the serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsTranilast significantly ameliorated GDM symptoms, including maternal body weight, hyperglycemia, insulin insufficiency, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance, enlarged litter size, and reduced litter body weight. Additionally, tranilast remarkably reduced the elevated expression of NLRP3 and proinflammatory cytokines.ConclusionsOur data clarified the protective role of the NLRP3 inhibitor, tranilast, on GDM by inhibiting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome as well as inflammatory responses. The findings mean tranilast might serve as a therapeutic drug to treat GDM.