1. Academic Validation
  2. Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition

Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition

  • Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):148-155. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac056.
Seth S Martin 1 Marc Ditmarsch 2 Mark Simmons 3 Nicholas Alp 3 Traci Turner 3 Michael H Davidson 2 4 John J P Kastelein 2 5
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • 2 NewAmsterdam Pharma B.V., Naarden, 1411 DC, The Netherlands.
  • 3 Medpace and Medpace Reference Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH 45227, USA.
  • 4 Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
  • 5 Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ AmsterdamThe Netherlands.
Abstract

Aims: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) lowering is imperative in Cardiovascular Disease prevention. We aimed to compare accuracy of three clinically-implemented LDL-C equations in a clinical trial of Cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition.

Methods and results: Men and women aged 18-75 years with dyslipidaemia were recruited from 17 sites in the Netherlands and Denmark. Patients were randomly assigned to one of nine groups using various combinations of the CETP Inhibitor TA-8995 (obicetrapib), statin therapy, and placebo. In pooled measurements over 12 weeks, we calculated LDL-C by the Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, and Sampson equations, and compared values with preparative ultracentrifugation (PUC) LDL-C overall and with a special interest in the low LDL-C/high triglycerides subgroup. There were 242 patients contributing 921 observations. Overall median LDL-C differences between estimates and PUC were small: Friedewald, 0.00 (25th, 75th: -0.10, 0.08) mmol/L [0 (-4, 3) mg/dL]; Martin/Hopkins, 0.02 (-0.08, 0.10) mmol/L [1 (-3, 4) mg/dL]; and Sampson, 0.05 (-0.03, 0.15) mmol/L [2 (-1, 6) mg/dL]. In the subgroup with estimated LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) and triglycerides 1.7-4.5 mmol/L (150-399 mg/dL), the Friedewald equation underestimated LDL-C with a median difference versus PUC of -0.25 (-0.33, -0.10) mmol/L [-10 (-13, -4) mg/dL], whereas the median difference by Martin/Hopkins was 0.00 (-0.08, 0.10) mmol/L [0 (-3, 4) mg/dL] and by Sampson was -0.06 (-0.13, 0.00) mmol/L [-2 (-5, 0) mg/dL]. In this subgroup, the proportion of LDL-C observations <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) that were correctly classified compared with PUC was 71.4% by Friedewald vs. 100.0% by Martin/Hopkins and 93.1% by Sampson.

Conclusion: In European patients with dyslipidaemia receiving a CETP Inhibitor, we found improved LDL-C accuracy using contemporary equations vs. the Friedewald equation, and the greatest accuracy was observed with the Martin/Hopkins equation.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01970215.

Keywords

Accuracy; Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition; Friedewald equation; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Martin/Hopkins equation; Sampson equation.

Figures
Products